GC2010
03-13 04:02 PM
Does no one know the answer to my question. Please help me, if you know the answer.
wallpaper Agent Provocateur release
parsu
11-10 08:17 PM
Your Employer can file extension of I-94 till Feb 2011. No need to go outside the country.
Rayyan
07-14 12:32 PM
Hi All,
I have to go to India for a family emergency.
I see that there are no dates avaialbe in July and Aug.
Does the window for appt opens for 6 weeks?
If I go without appt how do I how to go to consulatee without appt letter?
Do they ask for appt letter?
Please let me know.
Thanks
I have to go to India for a family emergency.
I see that there are no dates avaialbe in July and Aug.
Does the window for appt opens for 6 weeks?
If I go without appt how do I how to go to consulatee without appt letter?
Do they ask for appt letter?
Please let me know.
Thanks
2011 Rosie Huntington-Whiteley
pan123
08-30 06:29 PM
When did you filed? From what service center? When was last finger print done? and what's your priority date?
more...
upconvert
11-19 10:07 AM
Employment based I485 is pending and priority date is not current, and wont be current until we have cars that fly. Have valid advance parole from EB I485. Plan to file a family based I485 next month and wait for receipt notice and then travel out of country.
Is it possible to return to US on the advance parole from EB I485 after filing FB I485? (Application for a second advance parole based on for the FB I485 will be pending as it takes ~3 months to process AP).
Thanks in advance.
Is it possible to return to US on the advance parole from EB I485 after filing FB I485? (Application for a second advance parole based on for the FB I485 will be pending as it takes ~3 months to process AP).
Thanks in advance.
franklin
07-10 02:24 PM
What is this group and how is it connected to IV?
more...
Blog Feeds
11-22 03:21 AM
As we prepare to extend healthcare insurance to another 40 million people in the U.S., do we have enough physicians to care for them? According to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, over 25% of our population lives in medically-underserved areas where there is less than one primary-care physician for every 3,500 patients. Even under our present healthcare system, the Association of American Medical Colleges projects a deficit of 159,000 physicians by 2025. At least 15 medical specialty societies have released studies projecting shortages in their fields. The American Academy of Family Physicians predicts a shortage of 40,000...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/carlshusterman/2009/11/universal-healthcare-without-physicians-.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/carlshusterman/2009/11/universal-healthcare-without-physicians-.html)
2010 Rosie Huntington-Whiteley
Robert Kumar
02-01 08:19 AM
^^^^^^^
more...
RedRaider
10-11 11:10 AM
Notices for Form I-485A
TSC advises that they do not issue receipt notices for Form I-485A. The center has also advised that the deposited check is enough proof that the filing was accepted.
Posted on Immigration .com
http://www.immigration.com/fromtheagency/tsc101007.html
TSC advises that they do not issue receipt notices for Form I-485A. The center has also advised that the deposited check is enough proof that the filing was accepted.
Posted on Immigration .com
http://www.immigration.com/fromtheagency/tsc101007.html
hair Agent Provocateur A/W 10
newyorker123
08-26 08:25 AM
I applied EAD for me and my wife, yesterday.
When I check for the case status, it shows my wife EAD application as I131(advance parole) document.
XXXXXXXXXXXX Y N 08/26/2010 I131 APPLICATION FOR USCIS TRAVEL DOCUMENT
I have complete I765 application with receipt still I guess I need to call them.
Is anyone in the similar scenarios?
When I check for the case status, it shows my wife EAD application as I131(advance parole) document.
XXXXXXXXXXXX Y N 08/26/2010 I131 APPLICATION FOR USCIS TRAVEL DOCUMENT
I have complete I765 application with receipt still I guess I need to call them.
Is anyone in the similar scenarios?
more...
Akopian
06-03 04:23 AM
Please delete this post
I am currently studying in the US on an F visa and have managed to loose my passport a couple of months ago. The passport itself is replaced but I hesitated to renew the I-94 since it takes longer time than my duration of status and it is cheaper to just leave the country and send a mail to USCIS later with proof of departure.
To the problem, I am changing status from F to A. Since the interview is not required I was able to obtain the new visa through mail. Now, I am currently in the US with a valid new visa but no I-94 which means I will be out of status two months after my F visa expires. Being close to the Mexican border my plan is to cross it and come back on the same day to officially get the A status and a new I-94. I will of course send photocopies of all the papers and stamps to USCIS to not fall out of status on the previous visa. Are there any legal problems doing this?
I am currently studying in the US on an F visa and have managed to loose my passport a couple of months ago. The passport itself is replaced but I hesitated to renew the I-94 since it takes longer time than my duration of status and it is cheaper to just leave the country and send a mail to USCIS later with proof of departure.
To the problem, I am changing status from F to A. Since the interview is not required I was able to obtain the new visa through mail. Now, I am currently in the US with a valid new visa but no I-94 which means I will be out of status two months after my F visa expires. Being close to the Mexican border my plan is to cross it and come back on the same day to officially get the A status and a new I-94. I will of course send photocopies of all the papers and stamps to USCIS to not fall out of status on the previous visa. Are there any legal problems doing this?
hot Rosie Huntington-Whiteley is
uslegals
07-18 12:58 PM
Hello friends -
My Receipt notice states that RECEIVED DATE for my 485 is July 17, 2007 and the NOTICE DATE is September 14, 2007.
In my USCIS online account when my click on my 485 RECEIPT No. it states -"CASE recd. & pending" ...On September 14, 2007, we received this I485 APPLICATION TO REGISTER PERMANENT RESIDENCE OR TO ADJUST STATUS, and mailed you a notice......
Shouldn't this state that they recd. the case on July 17, 2007.?? Can it be true that their system is showing a recd. date of 9/14 when actually the recd. date on the actual notice/797 is 7/17/07.
How many folks are seeing this.?? Is this how it is supposed to be..I mean is it normal for them to generate a default message like this using the NOTICE DATE when you click ur case #..??
CHEERS.!
My Receipt notice states that RECEIVED DATE for my 485 is July 17, 2007 and the NOTICE DATE is September 14, 2007.
In my USCIS online account when my click on my 485 RECEIPT No. it states -"CASE recd. & pending" ...On September 14, 2007, we received this I485 APPLICATION TO REGISTER PERMANENT RESIDENCE OR TO ADJUST STATUS, and mailed you a notice......
Shouldn't this state that they recd. the case on July 17, 2007.?? Can it be true that their system is showing a recd. date of 9/14 when actually the recd. date on the actual notice/797 is 7/17/07.
How many folks are seeing this.?? Is this how it is supposed to be..I mean is it normal for them to generate a default message like this using the NOTICE DATE when you click ur case #..??
CHEERS.!
more...
house Video for Agent Provocateur.
StillonH1B
08-26 08:32 PM
Hi,
Me and my wife went to India and I came back one week back with my ex employer visa without any problem,I had to show only the I-797 for the current company where I am working. My wife she is still in India coming back to US in September.
I am sending my I-797 original to her in the mail.
My concern is will the immigration officer ask her for my I-797 approval or her I-797 approval ( she is on H4). We don't have an I-797 approval for her as my H1 was applied before we got married.My current H1 is expiring on Jan 19th 2009 so we applied for extension for both of us and got the approvals but its only valid from Jan 19th 2009.
Any replies greatly appreciated.
thanks
Me and my wife went to India and I came back one week back with my ex employer visa without any problem,I had to show only the I-797 for the current company where I am working. My wife she is still in India coming back to US in September.
I am sending my I-797 original to her in the mail.
My concern is will the immigration officer ask her for my I-797 approval or her I-797 approval ( she is on H4). We don't have an I-797 approval for her as my H1 was applied before we got married.My current H1 is expiring on Jan 19th 2009 so we applied for extension for both of us and got the approvals but its only valid from Jan 19th 2009.
Any replies greatly appreciated.
thanks
tattoo face of Agent Provocateur
glamzon
05-24 10:39 AM
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:S.1348:
click amendments.
These get updated every while and then when they are introduced . keep monitoring and update the core team if you find something . thanks
click amendments.
These get updated every while and then when they are introduced . keep monitoring and update the core team if you find something . thanks
more...
pictures On slide: Rosie Huntington
Macaca
06-01 07:26 PM
Pelosi�s Order in the House (http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/01/us/politics/01web-hulse.html) By CARL HULSE (http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/01/us/politics/01web-hulse.html), June 1, 2007
The differences between House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and her predecessor, J. Dennis Hastert, could not be more striking.
He is a burly former wrestling coach, a conservative Republican from small-town Illinois who usually ran from the microphones. She is the designer-clad member of a political family, a wealthy liberal from San Francisco who sees herself as a top party spokeswoman.
But what could turn out to be their defining contrast was exhibited on May 24, when Ms. Pelosi allowed the Iraq war spending bill to clear the House with predominantly Republican votes while most Democrats � including her � opposed it. It was a marked departure from the principle that guided Mr. Hastert during his years as speaker.
Mr. Hastert was an advocate of governing the House by a �majority of the majority� � a standard he thought best served the interests of his Republican members and, by extension, the nation. Just months into her tenure, Ms. Pelosi has shown she will deviate from that approach, balancing the potential of significant rewards against big risks.
The rewards could come from success in winning approval of major legislation that reaches beyond party label. Critics of Mr. Hastert said his self-imposed rule prevented the House from considering centrist social and economic measures that, in their view, could have benefited both parties. It is likely, for instance, that a coalition existed in the House last year to pass an immigration overhaul that Republicans and Democrats could have hailed going into the elections. But strong opposition from a majority of the majority derailed that idea.
The risks are related to party cohesion. If a leader such as Ms. Pelosi regularly cuts against the wishes of most of the people who put her in leadership, it stands to reason they would eventually wonder if new leadership was warranted. At a more subtle level, passing important bills with coalitions built outside party lines can expose and deepen fractures within them and sap the support of interest groups that can be essential to winning and holding onto power.
Republicans see internal problems for Democrats as they sort through how to govern. �The problem for Pelosi is that the majority of her majority still has a minority mindset,� said John Feehery, a lobbyist who was an adviser to Mr. Hastert. �They would rather protest than legislate. And that dynamic will weaken her control over the House in the long-run."
While some anti-war groups remain outraged at the war vote, many Democrats were not all that upset with the way she handled it. Through some procedural maneuvers, the speaker allowed Democrats to back a minimum wage increase and popular domestic spending and still vote against the war money. At the same time, Democrats got out of what the leadership saw as a political jam that could have left them being blamed for cutting off money to troops overseas.
The next test for Ms. Pelosi will come on looming votes over increased free trade. Many - perhaps most - House Democrats are leery of going along with the push by President Bush, free-trading Democrats and congressional Republicans for new trade deals that they believe ship jobs out of the country and lack labor and environmental safeguards.
To some veteran House Democrats, the 1993 North American Free Trade Agreement is a particularly bitter memory. A majority of then-minority Republicans joined with a minority of then-majority Democrats to pass the deal sought by President Bill Clinton. Quite a few Democrats believe that approval of the trade deal over the objections of organized labor diluted union support in 1994 and contributed to the loss of Congress by the Democrats that year. Ms. Pelosi was among 102 Democrats who backed the 1993 trade deal; 156 Democrats, including the majority leader and whip, opposed it.
Anti-trade Democrats are worried the war vote foreshadowed Ms. Pelosi making a similar trade move this year, forgetting the hard lessons of NAFTA. They promise that such a decision will stir strong resentment. Ms. Pelosi has urged lawmakers not to jump to conclusions, but she is making no guarantees that legislation must have majority Democratic backing.
�I have to take into consideration something broader than the majority of the majority in the Democratic Caucus,� she told reporters.
The differences between House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and her predecessor, J. Dennis Hastert, could not be more striking.
He is a burly former wrestling coach, a conservative Republican from small-town Illinois who usually ran from the microphones. She is the designer-clad member of a political family, a wealthy liberal from San Francisco who sees herself as a top party spokeswoman.
But what could turn out to be their defining contrast was exhibited on May 24, when Ms. Pelosi allowed the Iraq war spending bill to clear the House with predominantly Republican votes while most Democrats � including her � opposed it. It was a marked departure from the principle that guided Mr. Hastert during his years as speaker.
Mr. Hastert was an advocate of governing the House by a �majority of the majority� � a standard he thought best served the interests of his Republican members and, by extension, the nation. Just months into her tenure, Ms. Pelosi has shown she will deviate from that approach, balancing the potential of significant rewards against big risks.
The rewards could come from success in winning approval of major legislation that reaches beyond party label. Critics of Mr. Hastert said his self-imposed rule prevented the House from considering centrist social and economic measures that, in their view, could have benefited both parties. It is likely, for instance, that a coalition existed in the House last year to pass an immigration overhaul that Republicans and Democrats could have hailed going into the elections. But strong opposition from a majority of the majority derailed that idea.
The risks are related to party cohesion. If a leader such as Ms. Pelosi regularly cuts against the wishes of most of the people who put her in leadership, it stands to reason they would eventually wonder if new leadership was warranted. At a more subtle level, passing important bills with coalitions built outside party lines can expose and deepen fractures within them and sap the support of interest groups that can be essential to winning and holding onto power.
Republicans see internal problems for Democrats as they sort through how to govern. �The problem for Pelosi is that the majority of her majority still has a minority mindset,� said John Feehery, a lobbyist who was an adviser to Mr. Hastert. �They would rather protest than legislate. And that dynamic will weaken her control over the House in the long-run."
While some anti-war groups remain outraged at the war vote, many Democrats were not all that upset with the way she handled it. Through some procedural maneuvers, the speaker allowed Democrats to back a minimum wage increase and popular domestic spending and still vote against the war money. At the same time, Democrats got out of what the leadership saw as a political jam that could have left them being blamed for cutting off money to troops overseas.
The next test for Ms. Pelosi will come on looming votes over increased free trade. Many - perhaps most - House Democrats are leery of going along with the push by President Bush, free-trading Democrats and congressional Republicans for new trade deals that they believe ship jobs out of the country and lack labor and environmental safeguards.
To some veteran House Democrats, the 1993 North American Free Trade Agreement is a particularly bitter memory. A majority of then-minority Republicans joined with a minority of then-majority Democrats to pass the deal sought by President Bill Clinton. Quite a few Democrats believe that approval of the trade deal over the objections of organized labor diluted union support in 1994 and contributed to the loss of Congress by the Democrats that year. Ms. Pelosi was among 102 Democrats who backed the 1993 trade deal; 156 Democrats, including the majority leader and whip, opposed it.
Anti-trade Democrats are worried the war vote foreshadowed Ms. Pelosi making a similar trade move this year, forgetting the hard lessons of NAFTA. They promise that such a decision will stir strong resentment. Ms. Pelosi has urged lawmakers not to jump to conclusions, but she is making no guarantees that legislation must have majority Democratic backing.
�I have to take into consideration something broader than the majority of the majority in the Democratic Caucus,� she told reporters.
dresses Rosie Huntington-Whiteley
maruthip
05-31 11:01 AM
Iam on H1 and my wife and 2 kids are on H4. we have been here for 3.5 yrs now. My petition has to be extended next year. My employer is delaying my GC process (not applied yet).
My Wife's brother who is a citizen is planning to apply for I-130 for my wife (not sure if it can be applied for me and kids as well, that is a different question).
However my main questions are:
- if he applies for I-130 for my wife, will it affect her H4 status or will I-130 application be affected due to her H4 status here?
- Will we have a problem when we apply for the petition renewal next year?
- Also will it affect the employer based Green card application (whenever int he future my employer applies for me)?
Thanks in advance for your reply
Thanks
My Wife's brother who is a citizen is planning to apply for I-130 for my wife (not sure if it can be applied for me and kids as well, that is a different question).
However my main questions are:
- if he applies for I-130 for my wife, will it affect her H4 status or will I-130 application be affected due to her H4 status here?
- Will we have a problem when we apply for the petition renewal next year?
- Also will it affect the employer based Green card application (whenever int he future my employer applies for me)?
Thanks in advance for your reply
Thanks
more...
makeup Rosie Huntington-Whiteley
iv_only_hope
01-17 02:57 PM
http://www.uscis.gov/files/testimony/testimony_ETG_17jan08.pdf
girlfriend Rosie Huntington-Whiteley
sapanach
02-24 03:49 PM
HI ,
THANKS IN ADVANCE!!!!!!
i m really in trouble plz help me by giving suggesstion to my question.
QUESTION:[/B]
[B]I came to US on March 28th 2008 on H4 Visa and applied on March 29th for new H1B with COS for Oct 2008 quota. I see the h1b approval of I129 petition on Jun 2, 2008 WITH attached I-94 WITH IT. Till today I have not received approval notice from my employer and did not applied for SSN and has not started working for my employer. On contacting my employer they told I am still on H4 status and will be on H1B status only if I apply for SSN. Please verify if tht is correct.Also i dont have any paystubs uptil now.I need your help to understand my status right now in U.S and what is the right action to take now .
My H4 stamp in passport is till Oct 10th 2009 and my husband is right now working on H1B status.
Thanks again!!!!!!!!
PLEASE REPLY EARLIEST....
THANKS IN ADVANCE!!!!!!
i m really in trouble plz help me by giving suggesstion to my question.
QUESTION:[/B]
[B]I came to US on March 28th 2008 on H4 Visa and applied on March 29th for new H1B with COS for Oct 2008 quota. I see the h1b approval of I129 petition on Jun 2, 2008 WITH attached I-94 WITH IT. Till today I have not received approval notice from my employer and did not applied for SSN and has not started working for my employer. On contacting my employer they told I am still on H4 status and will be on H1B status only if I apply for SSN. Please verify if tht is correct.Also i dont have any paystubs uptil now.I need your help to understand my status right now in U.S and what is the right action to take now .
My H4 stamp in passport is till Oct 10th 2009 and my husband is right now working on H1B status.
Thanks again!!!!!!!!
PLEASE REPLY EARLIEST....
hairstyles Rosie Huntington-Whiteley
wandmaker
07-29 04:35 PM
File your EAD based on where you live - it does not matter where you 485 is being processed.
pappu
08-21 03:58 PM
http://www.petitiononline.com/legalimm/petition.html
yes it was done by someone and this link was posted on a thread too. Many people signed but dont know what became of that.
several people signed as Anil Ambani , Amitabh Bachhan etc..
I am cynical about such online petitions and their usefulness.
yes it was done by someone and this link was posted on a thread too. Many people signed but dont know what became of that.
several people signed as Anil Ambani , Amitabh Bachhan etc..
I am cynical about such online petitions and their usefulness.
Maverick1
10-09 04:48 PM
Jul 2nd filer. EAD approved late Sep and notice mailed on 10/2/07. (LUD on EAD 10/2)
There is a LUD on the AP application on 10/4/07, but the status still says case received and pending. What could this LUD be ?
When I saw the LUD (with 10/4) I got excited and thought AP was approved too, but when I click the case details , it still says pending. The text of the details did not change.
There is a LUD on the AP application on 10/4/07, but the status still says case received and pending. What could this LUD be ?
When I saw the LUD (with 10/4) I got excited and thought AP was approved too, but when I click the case details , it still says pending. The text of the details did not change.
No comments:
Post a Comment